Tracking Wealth Through the AI Lens
Okay, so Blue Origin managed to get a rocket up (and mostly down) without exploding this time. Big deal. News outlets are tripping over themselves to frame this as some kind of "shot across the bow" at SpaceX. Give me a break. Let's be real, they're still playing catch-up, and it's painful to watch.
They named the reusable stage "Never Tell Me the Odds." Cute. Real cute. But the odds are, and always have been, stacked against them. SpaceX has been landing rockets for years. Years! Blue Origin just managed to do it once, and now we're supposed to act like they've suddenly become a threat? Please.
And ESCAPADE? A mission to study space weather affecting Mars? I'm sure it's important, but let's not pretend this is some groundbreaking achievement. It's more like a participation trophy after failing to launch in January. The fact that a solar storm almost screwed this launch, too, is just the icing on the cake. Talk about irony... or maybe just bad planning.
NASA's acting administrator, Sean Duffy, is "reopening competition" for the Artemis III lunar lander. Translation: Starship is taking too long, and NASA is panicking. I get it. Elon's timelines are, shall we say, optimistic. But turning to Blue Origin as a backup plan? That's like trading a Ferrari for a rusty pickup truck because the Ferrari's in the shop. Sure, the truck might get you there eventually, but you're not exactly arriving in style.

Blue Origin's CEO, Dave Limp, says they'll "move heaven and Earth" to help NASA get back to the moon. That's what they all say. Remember when they were gonna have orbital hotels and space tourism for the masses? Where's all that? It's always "someday," never today. I'll believe it when I see it.
Starship is a mess. A glorious, fire-spewing, potentially catastrophic mess. But it's our mess. And it's the only thing on the horizon that has the potential to truly revolutionize space travel. Blue Origin is playing it safe, tinkering around the edges. Elon is trying to build a whole new world. Which one do you think is more likely to succeed in the long run?
SpaceX launches all the time. Offcourse sometimes they have problems, but they learn and adapt. Blue Origin? They launch so infrequently that each one is treated like the second coming. And that's the problem right there. It's not about individual successes; it's about building a reliable, sustainable, and dare I say, boring space program. SpaceX is boringly successful. Blue Origin is just trying to get noticed.
Blue Origin can have their little victory lap. They landed a booster. Good for them. But until they can match SpaceX's launch cadence, cost, and ambition, they're just a footnote in the history of space exploration. And honestly, I'm not holding my breath.